Harald Belker (automotive designer): We were supposed to just watch and listen and see what people had to say.Ĭoupland: It was a big deal back then to have that real-time feedback. Stewart Brand (editor of Whole Earth Catalog): They had graphic artists there who could immediately draw things that were being described. Schwartz: We would ask questions: What about advertising? What about transportation? What about newspapers? What about food? The script hadn't been written at that point, yet many of the discussions from that weekend would go on to become visual touchpoints in a movie that turned out to be remarkably prescient: We really do operate computers by gesture, live in a world with self-driving cars, and have police departments that predict crime hot spots. So Spielberg convened an ad hoc think tank: He invited a small group of the foremost thinkers in science and technology, along with a handful of people involved with the movie, to hang out for a weekend and talk about the future. Instead, he wanted his film to be a realistic depiction of how things might actually look in 50 years. See also: How Accurate Were Minority Report's Technology Pre-Cogs? He wanted the world of the movie to be different from our own, but he also wanted to avoid the exaggerated and often dystopian speculation that plagued most science fiction. There was just one problem: The story was set in the undated future, and the director had no idea what that future should look like. Dick's short story "The Minority Report" into a $100 million action movie starring Tom Cruise. The year was 1999, and Steven Spielberg was preparing to turn Philip K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |